yesterday's article I liked a lot. I like a lot to know that this year will not increase the rates of Tarsu , while the tax on advertising and posting little I care, even if the local billboards that are made are promptly removed by some vandal / political opponent / private non- wants to see local billboards that are then stamped "uncomfortable" or bulky where there are the obituaries of the dead. But it would be to discuss what it means, in respect of rates of school and kindergarten, "Adaptation to only index Istat. In any case, all those who come out to give some prices, as happened a few weeks ago, on the school and everything else will say a bullshit sesquipedale . In June there will be a new contract and only then we will see what it will cost the service in September and was higher than the tax although I think it is right that from now on it is correct that the service is paid mostly by those who uses and not with the money of all .
Below is the portion of the article in the Gazzettino regarding the negotiations between the junta and our spa Veritas concerning the payment of the tax in four installments.
"These include Tarsu, and the authorities in previous years had suffered double-digit increases. The 'Junta Gotthard, however, as a result of contacts made in recent months with Veritas spa (company that manages the services removal of waste) was able to maintain for the current year, the same rates for all existing users active. The commitment for the future, is to arrive in the near future (according to Veritas), a new mechanism for calculating the costs, which will result in the preservation of constant current rates. The administration wants to dilute the fee in four installments, in April, June, September and November. "
Now, a thought I want to ask friends that the opposition will meet tonight for a Arino" discuss "in bubbles with a pipe in his mouth on issues of vital concern Arino. Too bad we can not go, but I think it served as The debate will take place: it will be a launching tirades against the current administration and who is outside without something useful. It would be interesting, however, that some of the lords of the initiative proponents should explain to all taxpayers present what prompted them to donate all that money to the associations of citizens between 2008 and 2010 that DoloVeneto published the other day - to which has the merit of having done a search in a very long time. I'd like there was someone who went there to discuss everything and gave detailed account. Or here or DoloVeneto.
0 comments:
Post a Comment